The legal landscape surrounding same-sex marriage and divorce has seen significant developments over the past few decades. With the recognition of same-sex marriage in the United States following the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015, the legal rights and responsibilities of same-sex couples have largely aligned with those of opposite-sex couples. However, when it comes to divorce, there are particular challenges that same-sex couples may face, especially concerning the equitable distribution of marital property.
In the state of New York, the equitable distribution of assets in divorce proceedings is governed by specific laws that aim to ensure a fair division of property. For same-sex couples, the legal considerations surrounding equitable distribution can be nuanced due to factors such as the length of the marriage, the period of cohabitation before marriage, and the unique circumstances that may arise when dividing assets. This page explores the legal considerations involved in equitable distribution in same-sex divorce cases and how New York courts handle these issues.
Understanding Equitable Distribution in New York
Equitable distribution is the legal principle by which marital property is divided between spouses during divorce. In New York, equitable distribution does not mean an equal 50-50 split of assets; rather, it means a fair division based on various factors determined by the court. Marital property typically includes assets and debts acquired during the marriage, while separate property refers to assets owned by each spouse before the marriage or acquired individually by gift or inheritance during the marriage.
For same-sex couples, the principle of equitable distribution applies just as it does for opposite-sex couples. However, one of the primary issues that can complicate equitable distribution in same-sex divorces is the timeline of the relationship. Many same-sex couples were together for years, if not decades, before the legalization of same-sex marriage. In such cases, the courts may need to consider the period of cohabitation before marriage when determining how to divide assets, even though the marriage itself may have been relatively short.
The staff is extremely friendly and knowledgeable. They truly care about their clients and walk you through the process every step of the way. I highly recommend Jean and here team for any legal needs.– Joseph B.
Was a real advocate for me while going through my divorce. Responded to emails and calls promptly and guided me through the entire process. Fair, responsive and frankly a light during a tough time.– Melissa W.
Cohabitation Before Legal Marriage
One of the unique challenges in same-sex divorce cases is how to account for the years of cohabitation that may have preceded the legal recognition of the marriage. Many same-sex couples lived together as domestic partners for years before they had the legal right to marry. During this time, they may have acquired property, established joint financial accounts, and shared other aspects of life that are typically considered in divorce proceedings.
While New York law does not automatically recognize periods of cohabitation as part of the marriage for the purpose of equitable distribution, courts have begun to consider the financial and personal contributions made by each spouse during the pre-marriage period. This approach allows for a more holistic view of the relationship and the division of assets, taking into account the reality that many same-sex couples have intertwined their lives long before their marriage was legally recognized.
The court may look at the couple’s financial arrangements, including how they managed household expenses and whether they jointly contributed to the acquisition of property. The goal is to ensure that one spouse is not unfairly disadvantaged by the relatively short length of the marriage if, in fact, the couple had been living as partners in every sense for many years prior to the marriage.
How long does a Divorce take? What is a no Fault Divorce in NY?Related Videos
Division of Marital Property
The division of marital property in same-sex divorce cases follows the same principles as in other divorces. Marital property includes any assets or debts acquired during the marriage, regardless of which spouse holds the title or whose name is on the account. This includes real estate, bank accounts, retirement accounts, investments, and even debts such as credit card balances and loans.
In determining an equitable distribution of property, the court considers several factors. These may include the length of the marriage, the income and property of each spouse at the time of marriage and at the time of divorce, the age and health of both parties, the need of a custodial parent to occupy the marital residence, and any contributions made by one spouse to the career or education of the other. Courts also take into account the tax consequences of the distribution, the future financial circumstances of each spouse, and any other factors deemed relevant to ensuring a fair division of assets.
For same-sex couples, the court may also consider whether the couple had entered into any domestic partnership agreements or other legal arrangements before the marriage. These agreements may outline how the couple intended to handle the division of property in the event of a separation or divorce, and the court may take these intentions into account when making its final determination.
Challenges with Non-Biological Children
In some same-sex marriages, one or both spouses may have children from a previous relationship, or the couple may have adopted children together. In divorce proceedings, issues related to child custody, visitation, and child support are handled separately from the division of marital property. However, when one spouse is a non-biological parent, legal challenges can arise regarding parental rights and obligations.
New York law recognizes that both parents, regardless of biological connection, may have parental rights if they have acted as a parent to the child during the marriage. Courts have increasingly recognized the rights of non-biological parents in same-sex marriages, particularly when the couple has jointly raised the child or when one spouse has formally adopted the other spouse’s biological child.
However, in some cases, disputes can arise regarding parental rights, especially if the non-biological parent did not formally adopt the child. These situations can complicate divorce proceedings and may require additional legal considerations to ensure that the best interests of the child are protected while also safeguarding the rights of both parents.
Spousal Maintenance in Same-Sex Divorce Cases
Spousal maintenance, also known as alimony, is another key issue in divorce proceedings. In New York, spousal maintenance is awarded based on a variety of factors, including the length of the marriage, the standard of living established during the marriage, and the earning potential of both spouses. Spousal maintenance is not automatically granted in every case, but when it is, the court determines the amount and duration of the payments based on the specific circumstances of the divorcing couple.
For same-sex couples, the calculation of spousal maintenance follows the same process as for opposite-sex couples. However, courts may also take into consideration any unique circumstances related to the same-sex marriage, including any financial disparities that existed during the pre-marriage period of cohabitation. If one spouse was financially dependent on the other during the time when they were not legally allowed to marry, the court may weigh this when determining whether spousal maintenance should be awarded.
Retirement Accounts and Pension Division
Retirement accounts and pensions are often significant assets in divorce proceedings. In same-sex divorce cases, dividing these assets can be particularly complex, especially if the retirement benefits were accrued before the marriage or during a time when same-sex marriage was not legally recognized.
In New York, retirement accounts and pensions that were earned during the marriage are considered marital property and are subject to equitable distribution. The court may issue a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) to divide retirement accounts and pensions between the spouses. However, if a portion of the retirement benefits was earned before the marriage or during a time when same-sex marriage was not legally recognized, the court may need to determine what portion of the benefits is subject to division.
The division of retirement accounts can be complicated by factors such as tax implications, the vesting of pension benefits, and the length of the marriage. Same-sex couples may need to provide additional documentation to the court to establish the timeline of their relationship and when the retirement benefits were earned.
The Role of Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements
As in any marriage, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements can play an important role in divorce proceedings. These agreements allow couples to establish their own terms for the division of property, spousal maintenance, and other issues in the event of a divorce. For same-sex couples, such agreements can be particularly useful in addressing the unique legal challenges that may arise.
In cases where a same-sex couple entered into a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, the court will typically honor the terms of the agreement as long as it is legally valid and was entered into voluntarily by both parties. However, if the agreement is found to be unconscionable or if one spouse was not fully informed about the terms of the agreement, the court may set it aside and proceed with equitable distribution based on New York law.
Same-sex divorce cases present unique challenges, especially when it comes to equitable distribution. From the consideration of cohabitation before marriage to the division of retirement accounts and the complexities surrounding non-biological children, these cases require careful legal analysis to ensure that the division of property is fair and just.
If you are facing a same-sex divorce and have questions about equitable distribution, it is essential to have a dedicated legal advocate by your side. At Jean M. Mahserjian, Esq., P.C., we understand the complexities of divorce cases and are committed to providing compassionate and effective representation. Contact our firm today to learn how we can help you navigate the legal process and protect your rights.
